<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Avoiding Disaster with Paragraph Styles</title> <atom:link href="http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/</link> <description>Learn, discuss and explore the realm of Graphic Design.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 01:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: LaurenMarie</title><link>http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-17671</link> <dc:creator>LaurenMarie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:35:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/#comment-17671</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Tynan&lt;/strong&gt;, I prefer to stay away from JPG (actually ID will take native PSDs!), but you are right about the file size. I think there&#039;s an ongoing debate among print designers about the best resolution, too, most argue it&#039;s about 200-250 (2x the lpi of the printer), not the 300 dpi we&#039;re taught in school. You seem to know quite a bit about various PDF settings, Tynan! Would you be interested in writing an article on it for this blog? I would love to hear more about what you think are the ideal settings, why you think so and how to create them. You&#039;re welcome to &lt;a href=&quot;http://creativecurio.com/contact/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contact me&lt;/a&gt; (I&#039;ll send you an email later this evening as well). Oh, and you&#039;re welcome to ask any ID questions in the comments or email me. I love helping and figuring things out!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tynan</strong>,<br /> I prefer to stay away from JPG (actually ID will take native PSDs!), but you are right about the file size. I think there&#8217;s an ongoing debate among print designers about the best resolution, too, most argue it&#8217;s about 200-250 (2x the lpi of the printer), not the 300 dpi we&#8217;re taught in school. You seem to know quite a bit about various PDF settings, Tynan! Would you be interested in writing an article on it for this blog? I would love to hear more about what you think are the ideal settings, why you think so and how to create them. You&#8217;re welcome to <a href="http://creativecurio.com/contact/">contact me</a> (I&#8217;ll send you an email later this evening as well). Oh, and you&#8217;re welcome to ask any ID questions in the comments or email me. I love helping and figuring things out!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tynan</title><link>http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-17666</link> <dc:creator>Tynan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/#comment-17666</guid> <description>Hello all, reading and finding this ID articles very helpful, long time Quark user moving over to IDone point, jpgs are fine and I use them all the time, Maximum or even high quality will still save you sometimes huge amounts of file size while not touching the quality of the picture, the printing process will downgrade it far more, you can always keep your &#039;master&#039; tiff or eps file in caseand Acrobat&#039;s reduce file size essentially discards redundant crap in the file, it&#039;s all settable anyway, for example excessive resolution in graphics is sheer waste and can govery worth poking around in Distiller settings (or pdf export settings) minor tweaks on compression and downsampling can bring huge benefits in final file sizeand I&#039;m a publishing professional in case anyone thinks I&#039;m a tyro!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all, reading and finding this ID articles very helpful, long time Quark user moving over to ID</p><p>one point, jpgs are fine and I use them all the time, Maximum or even high quality will still save you sometimes huge amounts of file size while not touching the quality of the picture, the printing process will downgrade it far more, you can always keep your &#8216;master&#8217; tiff or eps file in case</p><p>and Acrobat&#8217;s reduce file size essentially discards redundant crap in the file, it&#8217;s all settable anyway, for example excessive resolution in graphics is sheer waste and can go</p><p>very worth poking around in Distiller settings (or pdf export settings) minor tweaks on compression and downsampling can bring huge benefits in final file size</p><p>and I&#8217;m a publishing professional in case anyone thinks I&#8217;m a tyro!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LaurenMarie</title><link>http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-13451</link> <dc:creator>LaurenMarie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 22:26:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/#comment-13451</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;giridhar&lt;/strong&gt;, I&#039;ve never used an XML workflow before. You can try to look it up in &lt;a href=&quot;http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS96346460-C5B6-42c7-88F5-086287793984.html&quot; title=&quot;InDesign CS3: Importing XML&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;InDesign LiveDocs&lt;/a&gt; on the subject or, if that doesn&#039;t help, I would highly recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://indesignsecrets.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;InDesign Secrets&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>giridhar</strong>,<br /> I&#8217;ve never used an XML workflow before. You can try to look it up in <a href="http://livedocs.adobe.com/en_US/InDesign/5.0/WS96346460-C5B6-42c7-88F5-086287793984.html" title="InDesign CS3: Importing XML">InDesign LiveDocs</a> on the subject or, if that doesn&#8217;t help, I would highly recommend <a href="http://indesignsecrets.com">InDesign Secrets</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: giridhar</title><link>http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-13448</link> <dc:creator>giridhar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:17:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativecurio.com/2007/11/avoiding-disaster-with-paragraph-styles/#comment-13448</guid> <description>Hi, Really Informative article.I have question,I have text loading from xml file, which has text like below &quot;Welcome The People of United States of America&quot; coming in single xml tag.I want to show &quot;Welcome&quot; in one line and the rest in second line. How to apply  Shift+Return in this case.Thanks Giridhar</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /> Really Informative article.I have question,</p><p>I have text loading from xml file, which has<br /> text like below<br /> &#8220;Welcome<br /> The People of United States of America&#8221;<br /> coming in single xml tag.</p><p>I want to show &#8220;Welcome&#8221; in one line and the rest in second line. How to apply  Shift+Return in this case.</p><p>Thanks<br /> Giridhar</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/22 queries in 0.155 seconds using disk

Served from: creativecurio.com @ 2012-02-10 18:49:28 -->
